Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Take Your Time

6/21/23
 
Me: 
 

Me: its tiem

Me: bitch

Paul: Ooh are you playing P5?

Paul: Warning: it becomes retarded halfway through.

Paul: Well it's Japanese so.... Obviously.

Me: Main character’s backstory is he’s a social pariah for preventing a rape so starting off regarded as well.

Me: HIGHLY regarded by those in the video gaming community that is!

Paul: 3 felt very dry.

Me: Yeah I gave up.

Me: Maybe the remake will be better.

Paul: 5 has more verve and heart.

Paul: And it sounds and looks incredible.

Paul: I adore the battle theme.

Paul: Unfortunately idk they got too ambitious with the plot? And the characters are lame compared to 4 IMO.

Me: Lame but so far also the same. The funnie best friend character, famous professional model with pigtails, talking animal sidekick from the Shadow Realm, gruff-voiced surrogate father figure.

Paul: Idk I don't find any of the girls interesting, except maybe the older women.

Paul: This is really the litmus test of a good Japanese game.

Paul: Supposedly 2 is lots of fun.

Me: Very problematic to make a game where you can fuck your teacher tbh.

Me: Someone needs to report Japan to the ACLU.

Me: Can’t wait for the gay panic comic relief.
 
7/4/23
 
Paul: Bug eyes for bug men.

Paul: How is Persona 5?

Me: I was stuck in the first dungeon for a while because they’re stupidly huge and unlike P4 you apparently can’t return to them to hunt for collectibles after you beat them. Not too much fun but almost immediately after finishing it it picked up again. When I have more time to play I’m excited to get back into it.

Me: About to go expose the statutory rapist gym teacher to the whole school!

Paul: Spoilers he kills himself in prison.

Me: What's worse than being raped? Probably being raped on top of a bed of hot coals.

Me: One thing I was confused by though is the talking cat is named Morgana, code named Mona in the Shadow World, and clearly voiced by a woman. I assumed it was a female character until several hours into the game someone called it “he.” I guess because he simps for the hot girl and the Japanese were afraid to have a lesbian talking anthropomorphic cat?

Paul: Idk man it's probably just a woman doing a cute animal's voice.

Paul: Ash from Pokémon's voice actress was a woman, it happens.

Me: Most of the Rugrats too.

Me: Morgana and Mona are feminine names afaik but maybe the Japanese didn’t know.

Paul: You're not wrong there.

Me: The whole gym teacher plot was kind of comical, they make it out to be this huge abuse scandal like Jerry Sandusky raping kids in the shower room but apparently he was actually just physically beating his students and like throwing dodgeballs at them?? It was never really sexual abuse, he’s just physically beating up the volleyball team lmao.

Me: But then he’s also coercing underage girls into sex at the same time.

Me: Why not that just stick with that?

Paul: The Japanese don't know when to stop.
 
Paul:
 

Paul: They're not subtle like us.
 
8/1/23
 
Me: 



Me: Me going to confession.

Paul: The Japanese are a deeply religious race.

Me: They witnessed firsthand the power of the spear of Longpenis.

Paul: Is that in the Bible?

Me: That reminds me there’s a great scene in Oppenheimer where he’s delivering his congratulations speech to his cheering team after the first bomb and he says “We don’t know yet what exactly the bomb did, but I bet the Japanese didn’t like it!” and then all the ambient sound cuts out and you just hear a woman screaming.
 
8/19/24
 
Me: What did Atlust mean by this


 


Me: Why did they do this to me twice



Paul: Hahaha wow never noticed this.

Paul: Somebody on the writing team has a hard-on for police femmes.

Paul: Umm are you playing both at once?

Paul: Are you playing P4?

Paul: WHO IS BEST GIRL

Paul: (it's Chie)

Paul: Hold on, I seem top remember you already played that one.

Paul: Yeah like a year ago or two.

Me: I played P4 last yearrrrr.

Me: Yeah.

Paul: You went with Chie?

Me: Almost, then I went with Rise instead.

Me: Literally dodged a bullet.

Me: I’m certain I made that same joke last year.

Paul: You playing P5 now?

Me: Yes!

Me: It’s good!

Me: (But not as good.)

Paul: Very stylish but not as good a plot apparently.

Me: Not as good a plot, also miss the setting and atmosphere.

Me: Character dynamics aren’t as good either.

Me: At least the talking cat is less annoying than the talking bear though.

Paul: Teddy ruled.

Paul: He was the token gaijin.

Me: He should have stayed in the costume. 
 
6/16/25
 
Me: 



Me: Localization or cultural appropriation?

Paul: P5 created Trump.

Paul: Are you playing this one?

Me: I've been playing it for so long.
 
6/18/25
 
Me: I finally beat who has been the main antagonist for the first 100+ hours and looked up about how much time is left from that point. People say about another 40 hours.
 
Paul: But music good
 
Me: P4 had a great soundtrack, I’ll be honest 5’s hasn’t blown me away
 
Me: 
 
 
Paul: I'm going to 🍇 Ann
 
Paul: and get her anime pregnant. 
 
Me: 👍
 
7/12/25
 
Me: 
 
  
Me: Most persona fans are pedos anyway. 
 
Paul: Anime is horny.
 
Paul: It's not pedophilia if a woman does it, and doubly not so if a hot anime does it.
 
Paul: get ur fax strate
 
Me: I was super pumped to fuck my anime teacher but they really hedged their bets by making you do all her social links with her annoying maid persona.
 
Me: She had to work at a maid cafe to pay her rent because she was being extorted by the parents of a former student who she inspired so hard that they died in a car crash or something (??) 
 
Paul: Those bastards ripped off Dead Poets Society. 
 
Paul: Yeah I feel like I would've anime-dated either the teacher or the evil nurse, but TBF I don't know any of the other girls... Foreign girl, and autistic screen girl? Not too interesting
 
Me: Which one is foreign girl?
 
Paul: Anne Takamalaki 
 
Me: I liked autistic screen girl as a character but you would have to be some kind of sex criminal to want to date her.
 
Paul:
 
 
Paul: Yeah the maid thing was definitely overdoing it.
 
Paul: Even ANIME is more decadent and less exxciting than it used to be.
 
Paul: Who were the other gurlz?
 
Paul: The wife bought me a Switch, so I could get P5...but I liked P4 so much and it was so retro, idk I kind of don't want to play any of the others.
 
Paul: Oh wow are there THIS many??
 
 
Me: Yeah I think that’s all of them 
 
Paul: This is where they send people like us: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russky_Island 
 
Paul: Rusky Island.
 
Me: Home of the Ruskies
 
Paul: lit just Russian Island in Russian 
 
Paul: I love it 
 
Me: Haru is boring and lame. Chihuahua is like a fake psychic college-aged girl who you can help to stop scamming people by pretending to be psychic or something. Hifumi is a chess player. Ohya is a trashy drunk reporter. 
 
Me: Kasumi is cool but not romanceable until post-game
 
Paul: Ohya seemed fun but I still ike the nurse or teacher more 
 
Paul: lol
 
Me: Makoto is P5 best girl 
 
Paul: I'll look her up. 
 
Paul: "As a result of her dad's advice, whenever she plays Shogi, she verbalizes her actions in a lively and animated roleplay of being ruler of a mythical kingdom."  
 
Paul: hahahahaha fuck them all 
 
Me: She just plays board games in a church because she’s depressed about her mom micro-managing her shogi career
 
Paul: #relatable 
 
Paul: Happened to #metoo 
 
Me: They just announced that they are remaking 4 as “Persona 4 Revival.” I don’t think I’ll play it though, I liked the old voice actors too much.
 
Paul: dude did you do P4? yeah I think I remember you did!!! 
 
Paul: "Despite appearing prim and proper on the surface, Makoto is actually more of a tomboy: she's trained in aikido, enjoys violent action movies, never wears skirts other than her school uniform (which she wears leggings under) and seems to care little about fashion other than the headband she wears in her hair." 
 
Paul: it's angry chie 
 
Paul: I like it 
 
Paul: I was a Chiebro in P4 
 
Paul: Makoto's thief outfit looks great
 
Paul:
 
 
Paul: I always thought that looked like a dick 
 
Paul: I knew it couldn't be but I couldn't think of what else it might be??  
 
Me: Dick armor.
 
Paul: you DID play P4 though? 
 
Me: Yes! 
 
Me: I am a devoted congregant of the Church of Rise. 
 
Paul: Oh really? You did Rise...a lot of people I wouldn't expect to do her, do Rise. 
 
Me: Oh I did her all right.  
 
Me: 
 

7/26/25
 
Me: Okay final statistics: I finished P4 in 65 hours over one month and P5 in 137 hours over two years.
 
Me: I’ll let you know how P3 is when I complete it on my deathbed.
 
Paul: I will never play P5 I think...too gay.

Friday, July 11, 2025

Ranking the Films of Audrey Hepburn

 

1. Roman Holiday (1953)

It had been at least a decade since I'd watched this, so I didn't remember just how good it is. Perhaps the most honestly, realistically sad ending to a romantic comedy that doesn't involve anyone dying of cancer. The age gap between leads, which somehow becomes only more exaggerated as Audrey's career goes on, is also at its least objectionable here; roughly a decade of difference isn't so dramatic, and feels right in line with the way the characters meet, fall for each other, and ultimately part. Of course this is how it happens: this was always how it was going to happen. One of my favorites of all time.
 
Rating: 5 out of 5 
 
Audrey's Look: Audrey spends the bulk of the movie dressed like Elizabeth from BioShock Infinite, which is fine by me, but the iconic haircut scene defines her vibe for the rest of the film.
 
The Age Gap 
Audrey Hepburn = 23
Gregory Peck = 36
 
 

4. Sabrina (1954)

I've seen this a few times before but it never left much of an impression on me. I gained a newfound appreciation for it on this latest viewing, however. It's actually quite funny, and while the romance never exactly feels perfectly true, it isn't difficult to understand how walking corpse Humphrey Bogart could find himself in a lot of trouble. "I'm about to make an ass of myself with a girl of twenty-two. Look at me! Joe College with a touch of arthritis."
 
Rating: 4 out of 5 
 
Audrey's Look: The second time in two movies that Audrey gets a haircut to symbolize her maturation from girl to woman, but it just doesn't hit the same this time. She goes through a lot of wardrobe changes after graduating French finishing school, each more stylish than the last. 
 
The Age Gap 
Audrey Hepburn = 24
Humphrey Bogart = 53
 
 

14. War and Peace (1956)

I can't even complain about this movie being three and a half hours long because it's War and Peace; there was a whole running joke in the Peanuts New Year's special about how long the book is. While the runtime did make it kind of a slog to get through, I can't say that I was actually bored watching it. But I had to stop about two hours in and didn't have an opportunity to finish watching it until a week later, by which point I had forgotten who most of the secondary characters were (except Napoleon Bonaparte, of course). Henry Fonda's weak-willed, indecisive male lead was an interesting choice for the romantic hero, but Audrey gets top billing and whenever she wasn't on screen I kept wondering "Where's Audrey?" I didn't hate it but I can't imagine ever wanting to watch it again.
 
Rating: 3 out of 5 
 
Audrey's Look: The first time you see her in the opening scene, sitting in that window wearing that yellow dress, you could have knocked me over with a feather.
 
The Age Gap 
Audrey Hepburn = 26
Henry Fonda = 50 
 
 

11. Funny Face (1957) 

"Oh, how could I be a model? I have no illusions about my looks; I think my face is funny." I have to imagine they didn't know they were writing for Audrey Hepburn when they turned in the script. After she was cast, maybe someone should have suggested not giving that line to the most beautiful woman who ever lived. They don't even try to She's All That her by giving her glasses or something, she just looks like Audrey Hepburn from scene one. If possible, she looks less attractive after the dramatic makeover scene. Otherwise, a bare-bones but inoffensive plot; only 103 minutes but it still feels overly long, because so much of that time is spent on pointless songs and dance sequences. That's what the people came for, I guess, but I just wanted to spend more time with Audrey working at the bookstore.
 
Rating: 3 out of 5 
 
Audrey's Look: She plays a fashion model so there are a lot of costume changes in this one, but the best is the shapeless potato sack she wears while working as a shop clerk. I love her hair in this scene, she's so cute I want to slit my throat. 
 
The Age Gap 
Audrey Hepburn = 27
Fred Astaire = 57 
 

12. Love in the Afternoon (1957)

"He was gay, Gary Cooper?" Mixed feelings about this one. It started out strong enough; this was John McGiver's feature film debut and he's hilarious in this movie. But by around the seventy-minute mark, when Audrey runs into Gary Cooper at the opera a year after they last met and he doesn't remember her, I was ready for it to be over. Most of the remaining hour dragged until Gary Cooper hired private eye Maurice Chevalier to discover Audrey's identity, not knowing that Chevalier was her father. The scene where he recognizes the true nature of the man and pleads with Cooper to let her go was quite powerful and had me hopeful for a bittersweet downer ending where Cooper's character does the first decent thing of his life and leaves her at the train station. Alas, they chickened out and went with an unearned romantic ending that soured the whole film for me. 
 
Rating: 3 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Her hairstyle in this film is adorable, but her character feels so much younger even than Audrey herself actually was at the time that it's kind of gross seeing her with Cooper's lecherous playboy soda magnate. She looks like a high school girl on a date with her grandfather. They should have given Gary Cooper The Substance before filming his scenes. 
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 27
Gary Cooper = 56 
 
 

15. Green Mansions (1959) 

Strange film where Audrey plays a savage jungle girl with great hair and perfectly manicured nails. She spends so much of the middle part of the film aimlessly frolicking through a Hollywood soundstage real South American jungle with Norman Bates and a baby deer that I started wondering if this was going to be the rest of the movie. But eventually it becomes a confused retelling of the white man's lust for gold bringing ruin to paradise, except with the white man immediately abandoning his self-destructive plan to avenge his father's death when he meets a pretty girl, leaving the murderous natives to do all the ruining. Native American villain Kua-Ko is played by Spanish-Italian actor Henry Silva, who went on to play North Korean spy Chunjin in The Manchurian Candidate a few years later. What a range!
 
Rating: 2.5 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: No costume changes this time as she spends the whole movie wearing a simple homespun muslin shift. Even dressed in rags, however, she's just too elegant and glamorous to be believable as a filthy jungle waif. This movie isn't horrible but with every decision evident on-screen you have to wonder what the hell they were thinking.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 29 
Anthony Perkins = 26 (What casting director was asleep at the wheel on this one? Didn't they know the rules???)
 
 

5. The Nun's Story (1959)

Knowing nothing about this film before watching it, my biggest fear was that it was going to be a boring religious flick. It turned out to be more like a horror movie, some real Handmaid's Tale vibes. Being a nun is apparently some kind of living death. Audrey undergoes such dehumanization and depersonalization, the self-eradication of her ego, the loss of her name and voice, even the forfeiture of her own memories, that I wonder if Margaret Atwood didn't take a little inspiration from this movie when writing her book; even the titles are similar. Allowed to play a serious, dramatic role for once, Audrey gives one of her best performances. All you see of her for the whole movie is her face, and she's still luminous. And she doesn't even make out with a geriatric!
 
Rating: 4 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: She's dressed like a nun for two and a half hours, but none of the other nuns has eyelashes like that.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 28
God = ∞
 
 

16. The Unforgiven (1960)

Extremely racist anti-racism movie, with a non sequitur incest subplot thrown in for good measure. Weird and mostly awful despite generally good performances.  
 
Rating: 1.5 out of 5 
 
Audrey's Look: I hate to say it but the frontier homesteader look just doesn't suit her. It's too bad she never did a real Western; I'm sure she would have nailed the cowgirl aesthetic. As it is, Audrey's a great actress but she cannot pass as Native American, no matter how much the other characters insist how "dark" she is.
 
The Age Gap 
Audrey Hepburn = 29
Burt Lancaster = 45
 
 

3. Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961)

"There was once a very lovely, very frightened girl. She lived alone except for a nameless cat."
 
It's difficult to be objective about this movie when I've loved it as long as I've loved movies that weren't animated Disney VHS tapes in fat plastic clamshell cases. Truth be told, the book is better, both as a piece of art and as an iteration of this specific story, but that's okay; each is great in its own way and I love them both.
 
I would say that my affection for the film version peaked during my high school years. This makes sense to me, as it is in some ways a very high-school movie. I feel like a traitor saying that, but I don't mean it as a criticism. The movie strips out much of the raw pathos of the novel, not to mention its queer subtext and sexual subversiveness. In place of these are commercial melodrama and a comfortingly adolescent take on romance ("Is Holly Golightly a manic pixie dream girl?" Fuck you, who gives a shit?). 
 
The movie's wonderful, saccharine Hollywood ending plays like a cracked-mirror version of the novel's bittersweet denouement. The book leaves a knot in your stomach and a lump in your throat; the movie ends with true love conquering all, a fairy-tale kiss in the rain. It sounds trite and artificial described so simplistically, and maybe it is, but it's "a real phony," to quote O.J. Berman: it's earnest in its artificiality, if you're reductive enough to call it that.
 
Audrey steals the show, but I love the everyman earnestness of George Peppard's performance as well. His character in the novel is the unnamed narrator, a passive observer relating his experiences with a girl he once knew. He reads like a self-insert of Capote himself, a struggling writer trying to make ends meet as a gay man in 1940s New York. By contrast, Paul Varjak, now a named and active participant in the plot and definitely not gay, almost feels like a blank slate for the audience to project themselves on. I know that teenage me could hear himself in the sardonic musings of Paul's untested literary voice, could grasp the pointed deliberateness of Peppard's matter-of-fact, almost flat line delivery, his sober reticence a foil to Holly's manic energy and exaggerated diction.
 
 
Holly herself is 18 in the novel; Audrey Hepburn was 31 while playing her. The movie never gives her age, but its vague timeline suggests that she's around 20, an age that Audrey, although more beautiful than ever, clearly isn't. This discrepancy was never apparent to me while watching the movie as a teenager, but now that I'm 30 or 40 years old I can't help but notice. Audrey is wonderful in the film and I wouldn't want to see anyone else playing that role, even if the film's version of Holly reads very differently from the book's. But it's the role of a character who all signifiers indicate is very young. I can't untangle that Gordian knot, save to remember that Capote wanted Marilyn Monroe for the part and she was 34 at the time. 
 
Well, I guess it is just a movie, after all, but golly gee damn if I don't still love everything about it, apart from the horrible racist caricature.
 
Rating: 4.5 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: The tiara is iconic but I think this soft-focus closeup is my favorite shot of her in the film:


Guys only want one thing, and it's to find a girl who looks at them the way Audrey Hepburn looks at George Peppard in Breakfast at Tiffany's.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 31
George Peppard = 32

9. The Children's Hour (1961)

The heaviest and most uncomfortable entry in Audrey's filmography, with the most hateable child villain since that episode of The Twilight Zone with Billy Mumy. The movie goes to some very dark places and is emotionally aggravating to the extent of becoming hard to watch in several scenes, but part of its uncomfortableness comes from its choice not to engage with its subject matter as fully as it might have. The injustice and unfairness of how Audrey Hepburn's and Shirley MacLaine's lives are overturned by a lie heard halfway around the world is well represented, but the substance of the lie, the allegation of a lesbian affair between the two leads, feels danced around and largely unexplored. Perhaps it's because the movie was based on a play written in the 1930s, or because of production restrictions in Hollywood, but despite the subversive topic at its heart, it never felt quite as subversive as I wanted it to; it’s more about the dangers of fake news than of bigotry or homophobia. The one scene toward the end where Shirley MacLaine drags the kernel of truth inside the lie kicking and screaming into the light is the best scene in the movie.
 
Both leads deliver great performances, but Audrey's character is the more reserved and put-together of the two, leaving MacLaine to handle the most emotional heavy-lifting. Both characters struggle externally against the community that has turned on them as well as internally, but Audrey's fight is to remain true under pressure to the person she knows herself to be, while Shirley MacLaine does whatever she can to avoid confronting the truth of herself. It's a very sad and powerful movie, I just wish it had been more explicit with the ugly truths it laid bare on screen instead of being quite so squeamish about the audience's sensibilities.
 
Rating: 3.5 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Schoolmarmish and beside the point.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 32
James Garner = 33
 

6. Charade (1963)

Another old favorite of mine, Charade is a Hitchcockian thriller crossed with a screwball romantic comedy. The resulting tone can be somewhat jumbled at times, with genuinely tense sequences like James Coburn lighting matches in Audrey Hepburn's lap in a phone booth oddly juxtaposed with the script's inopportune horniness, as Audrey spends the whole movie begging Cary Grant to have sex with her while they're running from murderers. Grant's performance ranges from hilarious to uncharacteristically flat, but the latter is likely due to his reported discomfort with the age gap between romantic leads. Overall, though, the end result is a very funny and clever film that is a great joy to watch.
 
Rating: 4 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Persistently lovely throughout a variety of wardrobe changes, though sadly none has really become iconic except maybe the kerchief-and-sunglasses disguise when she's "undercover," and her brand new leopard-skin pill-box hat. She plays it a lot sillier than is typical of her performances, with lots of cute bug-eyed mugging and cartoonishly exaggerated expressions of distress. Wish she had done more movies like this.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 33
Cary Grant = 58
 

13. Paris When It Sizzles (1964)

One of those self-indulgent Hollywood movies about the making of self-indulgent Hollywood movies. Lightweight and insubstantial, this one at least has going for it a few good laughs delivered through random and bizarre comedic sequences, including a very funny performance by Tony Curtis. The scatter-brained plot of the movie-within-the-movie, while directly lampshaded in the film, never congeals into anything larger than the sum of its disjointed parts, save for William Holden's drunken confession of being a womanizing heel and a hack-fraud screenwriter. It makes one wonder if maybe the actual screenplay wasn't put together this way in real life, with the writer throwing everything he could think of against the wall until he hit 138 pages. Harmless but mostly unmemorable. "Did you ever realize that Frankenstein and My Fair Lady are the same story? One ends happily and the other one doesn't. Think about that next time you're in church."
 
Rating: 3 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Audrey rocks the Zooey Deschanel bangs better than Zooey Deschanel ever did, but her most interesting outfit in the film is the bomber pilot costume she wears during an imaginary aerial dogfight. I would have liked to see more genre-hopping like that instead of so many variations on the tiresome heist plot, but she does have those Big Magic Eyes™ everyone keeps talking about.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 33
William Holden = 44
 

7. My Fair Lady (1964)

My Fair Lady has never been one of my favorite musicals so I was surprised to realize, fairly soon into the movie, how much I was enjoying it. The three-hour runtime seems formidable, but it has an intermission, as all socially acceptable movies of a certain length do, and avoids the feeling of being rushed or abridged that stage musicals compressed into two-hour films often have. Audrey is delightful as Eliza, essentially playing two completely different characters for the price of one, neither a clean match for her typical performances. Her acting in the transitional phase from foul-mouthed guttersnipe to elegant lady of high society is especially hilarious. A much better movie than I remembered or expected.
 
Rating: 4 out of 5
 
Audrey's Voice: Audrey Hepburn was a lady of many talents, but singing wasn't one of them, as you might have guessed after listening to her vocals in Funny Face and her husky, whispery performance of "Moon River" in Breakfast at Tiffany's. It's not even that she was a bad singer, just that she didn't have the vocal strength or range of a trained professional. Perhaps, then, she wasn't the best casting choice for the lead in a major Hollywood musical, but if they were willing to bank on her name, they should have let her do the singing. If there's a black eye on this movie, it's that they cast an actress with such a distinctive voice as Eliza Doolittle and then dubbed almost all of her sung lines with a vocalist who sounds nothing like her. Reportedly the studio had told her beforehand that she would be allowed to do her own singing for the part, so she was very upset when she found out that they'd dubbed her in secret. I don't blame her.
 
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 34
Rex Harrison = 55
 
Why that hat so big?

10. How to Steal a Million (1966)

This one feels of a species with Funny FaceLove in the Afternoon, and Paris When It Sizzles: lightweight romantic comedies that are pleasant enough to watch but ultimately kind of disposable. Of those, Funny Face stands the most apart by virtue of being a musical (even if it doesn't have any good songs), but I'd put How to Steal a Million above the others as the one I feel I'd soonest rewatch. A heist movie, there's a certain cleverness to its construction, even if the specifics of the scheme aren't completely plausible. Audrey doesn't get much to do in this movie, blindly trusting in charming leading man Peter O'Toole, Lawrence of Arabia himself, to make the plot happen around her, but she looks gorgeous and hits all her comedic marks dead center. Their romance isn't one for the ages but feels the most believable (and least creepy) out of those in her "lesser" movies. A fun, breezy flick to put on when you have nothing better to do.
 
Rating: 3.5 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Audrey does her best Suzanne Pleshette.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 36
Peter O'Toole = 33 
 
 

8. Two for the Road (1967)

"We should have parted then."
 
"Why didn't we?"
 
"I didn't have the courage."
 
"You didn't have the courage? What courage did you need?"
 
"The courage to see that what was finished was finished."
 
A cousin to later dissolving-relationship dramas like The Way We Were and Blue Valentine, but unlike those movies, which tell a story about the beginning and end of a marriage, Two for the Road is more thematically a story about time: how it passes, how it repeats, how it changes and how it doesn't. It's the nonlinear forerunner to Richard Linklater's Before trilogy, a cinematic examination of a relationship's evolution throughout the span of a shared life.
 
It isn't necessarily Audrey's best performance, but it's certainly the most mature performance of her career. Having seen how she curated her image over her previous 14 films, even the one where she played a call girl, it was a shock to the system to suddenly see her openly talking about her sex life, having premarital sex and an extramarital affair, and getting called a bitch to her face, the latter of which was especially appalling. I wanted to punch Albert Finney on multiple occasions, not the least of which were the times I saw myself in him.
 
A very strong film, so maybe it's my own fault that I ultimately felt a little let down by it. It doesn't cut as deeply as a The Way We Were or a Blue Valentine, but it also doesn't offer the relief of an ending, even a sad one, even one you didn't want. Some things linger; some things go on; some things are never allowed to be finished, because we're too afraid of facing what comes after.
 
Rating: 4 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Still lovely but visibly in her late thirties, which made the scenes where she was playing an 18-year-old on a school trip a bit of an ask. Once she and Albert Finney separated from her distractingly younger peers, however, it was much easier to play the Hollywood game of make-believe.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 37
Albert Finney = 30
 
"They don't look very happy."
"Why should they? They just got married."
 

2. Wait Until Dark (1967)

In the best performance of her career, her last before her nine-year retirement from Hollywood, Audrey plays a newly blind woman living in New York. Recently married to a photographer, she struggles with her reliance on her husband and a young neighbor girl while learning how to function after losing both her sight and her self-sufficiency. One day, the devil comes knocking on her door.
 
Stephen King called Wait Until Dark the scariest movie ever made. I wouldn't want to oversell it, because it's a bit of a slow burn and more inducive of anxiety and dread than visceral terror, but it is the only non-supernatural horror movie I can think of, apart from maybe Psycho, where that feeling of dread stuck with me after the movie, and returns each time I rewatch it. 

Audrey's helpless heroine, trapped in her own home and imperiled by a sinister conspiracy, calls to mind Barbara Stanwyck in Sorry, Wrong Number. Unlike that picture, however, where the atmosphere of doom grows more and more oppressive as the film goes on, Wait Until Dark lures you into a false sense of security with the theatrical, overly elaborate workings of the villains' scheme. When Alan Arkin bumbles his way into Audrey's apartment, rambling in a funny voice and wearing old-man makeup and a fake mustache, you might almost think the movie is veering into comedy. Until you get to the third act, when it becomes a nightmare.
 
Audrey made 16 films during the main period of her Hollywood career, and she's a pleasure to watch in each of them: a talented actress, yes, and immeasurably beautiful, but also possessed of some indefinable charm and grace, a magnetic screen presence that thrills the eye. She was a true Movie Star, but even in her strongest dramatic performances in The Nun's Story and Two for the Road, you're still aware that you're watching An Audrey Hepburn Movie. 
 
Wait Until Dark is, in my opinion, the first time she really disappears into a role. Actors always have a hard time pretending to be blind, especially when they can't rely on sunglasses to hide their eyes, but Audrey is completely believable in this movie. The way she moves, gestures, reasons, and interacts with the other characters makes you forget that she's actually sighted. The movie treats her blindness as neither a superpower nor a simple plot inconvenience; it’s something she has to reason her way around, forced to rely on her wits as the only weapon she has against "the greatest evocation of screen villainy ever."
 
Alan Arkin's performance as Harry Roat, Jr., from Scarsdale is one of the most chilling in movie history. Looking like a cross between Doctor Octopus and The Corinthian, he oozes across the screen like some kind of secretion. Every time he touches Audrey you want to throw up.
 
The movie is very thematically concerned with sight: Audrey's famously expressive eyes fill the screen, now dulled and sightless, while the sighted Roat masks his own with dark glasses. He wears and discards many masks throughout the film, both through the theatrical characters he plays and the way he allows himself to be perceived, as a comic-book villain hatching cartoon schemes. Although she's blind, or perhaps because she is, Audrey alone can see through his disguises, but "not all the way. Even now, not all the way." 

The final moments of the film, when the last of his masks fall away, become almost a precursor to John Carpenter's Halloween: "A dark house. A woman alone. A man with a knife." For my money, Wait Until Dark is the more terrifying of the two.
 
 
 
Rating: 5 out of 5
 
Audrey's Look: Absurd and unfair.
 
The Age Gap
Audrey Hepburn = 37
Efrem Zimbalist Jr. = 48 
 
 
After her Academy Award-nominated performance in Wait Until Dark, Audrey Hepburn retired from acting for close to a decade in order to spend more time with her children. Eventually she returned to Hollywood to make five additional movies, but I didn't watch those.
 

Sunday, July 6, 2025

The Lost Prince

 

The Lost Prince 

Writer: Peter Sauder
Medium: Television
Air Date: October 5, 1985 
Timeline Placement: 15 BBY
 
Oh yeah, Mon Julpa time! (See below for details.)
 

The Lost Prince: A Droid Adventure

Author: Ellen Weiss
Illustrator: Amador
Medium: Picture book
Publication Date: November 1985
Timeline Placement: 15 BBY
 
An adaptation of the fifth episode of the Droids cartoon, the beginning of the series' second story arc. There are about a million retellings and partial adaptations of the six Star Wars films in the form of short illustrated children's books, and because there are already so many more substantial adaptations as well (novelizations, junior novelizations, comic adaptations, audio dramatizations, video game adaptations, manga, and so on!), I consider most of that cash-in kiddie stuff not worth bothering with. As with The White Witch, the reason I'm reading The Lost Prince, despite it being a straight adaptation of a pre-existing story, is because adaptations of Expanded Universe stories are extremely rare compared to adaptations of the movies, and the original illustrations commissioned for these books are wholly new EU artwork that deserves to be appreciated. 
 
The A Droid Adventure series adapted only four of the Droids cartoon's fourteen episodes. An additional three episodes were adapted by Dragon Picture Books, but those feature no original artwork, instead simply reusing stills and screengrabs from the TV series to illustrate their text. As such, I've elected to exclude them from this reading list. Also, I couldn't find any of them on eBay.

Where The White Witch was a quick and breezy read, The Lost Prince is, bizarrely, by far the longest picture book we've encountered so far, and the one written on the most advanced reading level. The illustrations are much nicer than those in The White Witch, but also take up considerably less page space. The White Witch boasted several double-page spreads with a few lines of text at the top of the page, whereas The Lost Prince has several pictures that are condensed down to half a page or less. Some pages have no illustrations at all, instead containing multiple paragraphs of text that, while printed in a somewhat large font, fill the entire page from top to bottom. It's almost like reading a real book!

The tale of Mon Julpa, the lost prince of Tammuz-an, is one I've been familiar with since childhood, having rented the cobbled-together "feature film" edit of those episodes on VHS from our local video rental store many times in my misbegotten youth. This book marks the beginning of that epic tale, the fateful meeting of R2-D2 and C-3PO with Jann Tosh, a twenty-year-old miner working for his Uncle Gundy on the backwater world of Tyne's Horky. Jann buys the droids at auction, along with a mysterious Kubaz-looking android, to protect them from the abusive alien thug Yorpo Mog. Jann has bitten off more than he bargained for, however, when he realizes that the so-called android is really a mute Tammuz-an alien in disguise. C-3PO names him "Kez-Iban," a Bocce word meaning "he who has returned from death," except in this children's book, where it means "he who has returned from life's journey."

The dastardly crime lord Kleb Zellock, who in this book talks with a weird and annoying-to-read speech impediment that he did not have in the cartoon, is after Kez, who is actually a mind-wiped prince-in-exile deposed by his traitorous vizier. He and Yorpo capture the mute purple giant, and when Jann and the droids try to save their friend they are captured as well. Kleb puts them to work in his mine transporting Nergon-14, "the deadliest element in the universe" according to Threepio. This explosive mineral is used by the Empire in the construction of proton torpedoes.

Thanks to Threepio's quick thinking (and detachable limbs), the gang soon escapes, and are joined by Sollag, a Tammuz-an loyalist who returns the royal scepter of Tammuz-an to Kez-Iban, restoring his memories. The Nergon-14 is triggered by Kleb's mining equipment, and our heroes must make a quick getaway. Kleb tries to flee, leaving Yorpo behind to die, but Threepio accidentally causes Kleb to shoot himself with his own mini-stunner. Jann Tosh, C-3PO, R2-D2, Mon Julpa, Sollag Den, Yorpo Mog, and Kleb Zellock's unconscious bulk escape the exploding mine aboard Kleb's gyrocopter, but it can't handle the weight of its current load so the boys dump all the cargo Kleb had loaded. As they make it to safety, Threepio observes that Kleb is going to be very unhappy when he wakes up, as that cargo contained all of his shekels keshels.

And everybody laughs.

Saturday, July 5, 2025

Fromm Here to Eternity

A Race to the Finish

Writers: Peter Sauder and Steven Wright
Medium: Television
Air Date: September 28, 1985 
Timeline Placement: 15 BBY
 
The finale of the Thall Joben/Fromm Gang/Trigon One story arc. The droids and their masters finally arrive on Boonta for the big speeder race, but Sise Fromm is still pissed about the loss of his base and apparently all of his wealth and underworld power and he shows up with son Tig and henchman Vlix Oncard looking for some revenge. 
 
The Fromms hire notorious bounty hunter Boba Fett, in his first EU appearance since the Clone Wars, to make our heroes pay for ruining his life. Fett advises Fromm that Jabba the Hutt has put a bounty on his head, but he'll refrain from collecting it and take Fromm's job instead because Fett "owes him a favor."
 
Boba Fett's appearance in this episode is noteworthy for a few reasons, one of which being how it informs the chronology of his life in the Expanded Universe. Prior to Attack of the Clones and the revelation that Boba had begun life as a clone of his "father," Jango Fett, the earliest events in his backstory were told in the short story "The Last One Standing: The Tale of Boba Fett" by Daniel Keys Moran. In that story, we first see Fett wearing his signature Mandalorian armor and operating as a bounty hunter in the year 12 BBY. However, a short prologue set an unspecified number of "years" earlier revealed Fett's past, supposedly before becoming a bounty hunter or even going by the name "Boba Fett," as a Journeyman Protector known as Jaster Mereel.
 
To this day, fans remain quick to throw this story under the bus whenever discussing pre-prequel Expanded Universe stories that were rendered non-canon by George Lucas's second Star Wars trilogy. They are, of course, completely wrong, as Fett's past as Jaster Mereel was salvaged by the Star Wars Insider article "The History of the Mandalorians." This article also incorporated the Star Wars Tales comic Outbid but Never Outgunned, which revealed that Fett had a young daughter, into his post-PT, pre-OT life. The result was a new backstory, largely left up to implication, wherein at some point Fett gave up bounty hunting to start a family and lived under the name of Jaster Mereel, revealed in the comic Jango Fett: Open Seasons to be the name of his father's mentor.
 
Fett's appearance here in "Race to the Finish" sets the outside cap on how early this phase of his life could have occurred. Taking all these sources into account, we can arrive at this rough timeline of Boba Fett's mostly untold backstory:
 
32 BBY: Boba Fett is "born" on Kamino as an unaltered clone of his father, Jango Fett, the so-called last of the Mandalorians until a bunch of retcons made that not true anymore. 
 
22–15 BBY: Following the death of his father at the outset of the Clone Wars, Boba Fett becomes a bounty hunter himself. He starts off working primarily for Jabba the Hutt, but Jabba apparently forgets who he is at some point because when the Hutt hires him in 5 BBY during the Han Solo Trilogy he acts as if it's the first time they've ever met.
 
c. 15–13? BBY: At some point he meets fellow bounty hunter Sintas Vel, and the two eventually have a daughter named Ailyn. Fett gives up the bounty hunting life to try to be a family man, taking the name of Jango's adopted father, Jaster Mereel, and becoming a Journeyman Protector on the world of Concord Dawn. His attempt at giving his daughter the idyllic family life he never had comes to an abrupt end when his wife is raped by a fellow Protector named Lenovar and Fett murders him, breaking his oaths and ending up exiled from the planet. He abandons his assumed name and returns to bounty hunting.
 
12 BBY: Boba Fett takes a job on the planet Jubilar, where he sees Han Solo for the first time when the 17-year-old is forced to fight for his life in a gladiatorial arena after being arrested for cheating at cards. 
 
What does all this have to do with the Droids animated series? Absolutely nothing, but it's way more interesting for me to talk about.
 
It's also worth mentioning (not really) that The Droids Re-Animated ties Sise Fromm's rise to power in the criminal underworld to Boba Fett eliminating his rival Klin Kartoosh, despite the novel Darth Plagueis establishing Sise as a major player in that scene during Palpatine's rise to power in the Old Republic, before Boba was even decanted born. Oops! 
 
Anyway, Fett sends his droid BL-17, a Mandalorian Battle Legionnaire manufactured by the Separatists during the Clone Wars, to become friends with C-3PO in order to get close enough to assassinate Thall and the others. Threepio tells Kea that he and BL-17 "graduated from the same production facility," which I would have thought the EU's continuity-weavers would have spun into a reference to Affa, the planet where C-3PO was originally constructed 80 years before Anakin Skywalker reassembled him from junked parts. Like maybe the Separatists had a manufacturing plant there during the war or something. But I don't think it ever gets mentioned. Maybe BL-17 was just lying about it.
 
But eventually some junk falls on BL-17 and crushes him to death. Fett tries to capture the White Witch but he gets owned by R2-D2, allowing Thall Joben to win the race (and a kiss from Kea). Despite failing at the job he was hired to do, Fett decides that he's had enough and turns on the Fromms, capturing Sise, Tig, and Vlix and taking them to meet their fate at the hands of Jabba the Hutt. The implication, as much as this tepid cartoon for babies can make one, is that they're all going to be murdered, explaining their absence from the criminal underworld in the OT.
 
Sadly, this grim fate was retconned away in order to the accommodate the continuity of the MyComyc comics The Stolen Ship and The Secret Disk, which depict Tig Fromm and Vlix Oncard still alive after the conclusion of this story arc. Keep in mind that Lucasfilm didn't consider these obscure Spanish comics officially licensed products and that half of them don't even fit the cartoon's continuity in the first place, but whatever. It's revealed in The Droids Re-Animated that the Fromms were able to convince Jabba to spare them "by paying the Hutt a sizable percentage of their business dealings and promising to commit their Annoo-dat clones to eradicating the Mandalorian Death Watch diaspora." 
 
The Death Watch was a Mandalorian splinter faction created for, and killed off in, the comic Jango Fett: Open Seasons. But that stupid Clone Wars cartoon brought them back for some reason, so I guess this retcon is an attempt to clean up the mess it left behind by taking the Death Watch back off the table again. Being wiped out by the villains from a Saturday morning cartoon show is about the fate they deserve. Oh I guess it didn't take though because they're still around in the Star Wars Galaxies MMO.
 
Speeder mogul Zebulon Dak offers Thall, Jord, and Kea a job designing and building racers, but according to his company policy, R2-D2 and C-3PO would have to be memory-wiped in order to remain with their masters. Aboard the The Sand Sloth after the racer, presumably heading back to Ingo yet again, the droids overhear their masters deciding to reject the job offer in order to keep their little found family together. Artoo and Threepio decide to sneak off the ship in an escape pod as their masters jump to lightspeed, giving them the freedom to take the opportunity they've been given. "Yes, it was a sacrifice, Artoo," says Threepio, "but that's what friends are for."
 
And the adventure continues...